IOJ goes to the Election Commission

Zafa Noor

Zafa Noor

[Zafa Noor, USA.]

The Election Commission in Bangladesh is apparently in good company, discussing “reforms” with ultra-right Islamist parties while plots are being designed to dismantle their mainstream, pro-democracy, secular counterparts.

Islami Oikko Jote (IOJ) was the first in line to be invited by the Election Commissioners (ECs) to discuss various aspects of election reform (including the reforms within political parties). The EC must be going from least to most important of the parties, considering that the IOJ won only 2 seats (out of 300) during 2001 parliamentary election.

Mufti Fazlul Huq Amini, the current chairman of IOJ was among the 10 people that met with the ECs on Wednesday, September 12. Amini later told BBC that he was turned off by the rule that one-third of the party committee seats should be filled by women members at all levels. He said it was not possible to allot 33% of the committee seats to women, considering the social and cultural reality of Bangladesh. IOJ opposed the proposal of using transparent ballot box for the polling, and proposed to increase the election expenses and reduce the party registration fees and made several other suggestions to EC.

What are the implications of sending an IOJ member to the parliament to represent a constituent? Their mandate pretty much revolves around fatwa, shariah, islamization of Bangladesh etc. Not that there is anything wrong in preaching one


5 Responses to “IOJ goes to the Election Commission”

  1. Anon

    Your first paragraph “Election Commission in Bangladesh is apparently in good company, discussing

  2. Zafa

    Anon:

    My bias (if you can call it) is towards democracy, secularism, upholding human rights etc. I have no bias towards any political party. If you cannot shake that off your head, or understand that it is possible to take a stand on political issues without belonging to a political party, then I

  3. Jagorook Manush

    Anon,

    Your reaction on Zafa’s article conveys the message of your high surge of euphoria and optimism about present CTG. But it also opens window of contradictions that deserves further discussion. Your deduction on CTG, EC and related issues can be defined as a punch of facts and fictions. It is very true that the most vital partner of this government is military and relatively weaker one is the

  4. Iconus.clustus

    Anon: You say, “…the current reformist government (incidentally, it is unique because it derives its support from both the civil society and military) is Bangladesh

Comments are closed.